The Mumbai Indians (MI), one of the most successful franchises in IPL history, are now facing criticism for what many are calling their biggest mistake ahead of IPL 2025—letting go of star wicketkeeper-batsman Ishan Kishan.
Known for his explosive batting and ability to turn games single-handedly, Kishan has already made a massive impact in the ongoing season with Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH).
Here are three compelling reasons why this move is being viewed as a major blunder:
1. Explosive Performance in IPL 2025
Ishan Kishan made a stunning debut for Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) in IPL 2025, scoring an explosive century against Rajasthan Royals.
He smashed 106 runs off just 47 balls, including 11 fours and 6 sixes, leading SRH to a formidable total of 286 runs—just shy of their own record for the highest total in IPL history.
This performance not only showcased his batting prowess but also sent a strong message to the cricketing world about his capabilities after being sidelined by MI.
2. Impact on Team Dynamics
Kishan’s departure from MI has left a noticeable gap in their batting lineup. Known for his aggressive style and ability to anchor innings, Kishan’s absence has deprived MI of a key player who could have balanced their batting order.
His ability to score quickly and build partnerships is something that MI has struggled with in recent seasons, especially after releasing him.
The franchise’s decision to not retain him has been questioned as they continue to seek consistency in their performances.
3. Message to the Selection Committee
Kishan’s phenomenal performance in IPL 2025 serves as a direct response to the Indian selection committee, which had previously overlooked him for national selection due to his absence from domestic cricket.
His century not only reaffirms his talent but also puts pressure on selectors to reconsider his position in the national team.
By excelling in the IPL, Kishan is making a strong case for his inclusion in future international fixtures, highlighting what MI has lost by not retaining him.
